Saturday, September 12, 2015
Peter Diamond Econ 490: Opportunistic Post
When I think of somebody who didn't act opportunistically when they had a chance, I immediately think of Dwyane Wade of the Miami Heat.
Dwyane Wade is a star basketball player in the NBA, and has won three titles with the Miami Heat. He won two of those with Lebron James, but James recently left for the Cleveland Cavaliers to return to his hometown. Many of the other key Heat players also left, and Wade was pretty much left alone. The next best player was injured, so Wade was stuck with a bunch of rookies who were not ready to make a serious push for the playoffs. So when Wade's contract was up, there were plenty of teams calling for his services. And not just any teams, but one's that had very good chances of winning a title if they added a player with Wade's skills.
This was a great opportunity for Wade to get paid a lot of money, and go to a team that could win right now. Dwyane Wade is 33 years old, so well past his prime, which means he only has a few years left to win another title. He had plenty of opportunities right in front of him, which gave him the chance to win in the present, while the Heat are about 5 years away from contending. But in the end, he didn't act opportunistically, and decided to stay and play in Miami.
Now why he did this, I think it was because of loyalty. Wade is one of the most loved player's in the league, but if he left Miami then he would be hated by fans and an organization that he's been with his whole career. I don't think he had it in him to leave Miami, and not be liked. It's tough to leave something behind, especially when that thing is a team that gave you a shot at living your dream. I think Wade stayed in Miami because of loyalty. Winning three rings is more than most players can ever dream of, so I think he accepted that he was happy with three and decided to stick with the fans who have always stood behind and supported him.
Regarding whether the various explanations as to why people don't act opportunistically amount to the same thing, I think for the most part they do. If you look at people who wait because good things come to those who wait, or people who think acting opportunistically might be unethical or lead to people looking down at them (like Wade), at the end of the day they're still after the same thing. All of these people still want to accomplish their goals, it's just that some want it faster than others. The ones who act opportunistically want the fast track to everything and take advantage of their opportunities. Sometimes this means not caring what other think of your actions. On the other hand, those who don't act opportunistically still want their goals, but are willing to wait and don't want to negatively affect others.
For example, I know someone who was the manager of HR working under the Director of HR at a health care company. They asked him if he wanted to jump up to Chief of HR over his boss, and he said no. He was worried about disrupting his relationship with his boss, and decided to wait and work his way up and let his boss take the position. But someone ever lower than him took the initiative to ask about the CHRO position, and ended up getting it. This guy acted opportunistically, seeing an opening and taking it. While the manager of HR stayed at his position, as well as the Director of HR. He wanted the CHRO position, just like everyone else, but wanted to do it the right way and not hurt any body's feelings.
They all amount to the same thing, but on different time tables.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The story about Dwayne Wade is a good one. Loyalty does matter for not acting opportunistically. I think it also matters, however, that Wade has experienced winning championships and has done so with different casts of characters - first Shaq, then Lebron. Some players are also mindful of their careers after they stop playing. If Wade has business interests in the Miami area that he expects to flourish and sustain for many years, that might be a hidden factor to his not wanting to change teams.
ReplyDeleteThe issue of accepting or turning down a promotion, even one where people leap frogged others in terms of responsibility is not a matter of opportunism is everything else has been above board. Sometimes competition for a job advance can be rather cutthroat and then opportunism may be more evident. But if everyone else is reluctant to take the job, I wouldn't think accepting it is a good example of opportunism.
Perhaps ironically, in my own career, the guy who offered me my administrative job originally didn't tell me he planned for me to replace him. Four months later I did just that. I probably wouldn't have accepted the job had I known that was the plan, because I didn't think I was ready for it. But it turned out well, for both him and me. So there may have been a bit of subterfuge at the outset, but ultimately no harm done.
I definitely agree that business interests might be a huge deciding factor. Some players don't think long term, and believe basketball will always be there and that they'll make enough money through basketball to live the rest of their life. But Dwyane Wade is a business man who knows basketball is a platform that can help open up doors to other lucrative ventures. If I was him and I had business interests that I expected to flourish in Miami, I would definitely stay there.
DeleteI also agree about the point that he's won with different casts of characters, and he might think he can win with a new cast. If he could win with a bunch of rookies it would definitely be a run for the ages.
Finally, I like what you said about how in you're career, you taking the job turned out well for both sides. Sometimes we overthink things and try to watch out for everybody's feelings, but at the end of the day we can't make everybody happy. If I knew the plan was that I was taking over someone's job, I probably wouldn't have done it either. But sometime's things happen for a reason and it all works out in the end.